"The beaches of the world are full of hot young white women. The black flags of our corsairs, out on wife-raids, will be a common sight in the future, and this will only increase the number of nubile young women vacationing there."
Very solid advice here. However, being an armchair historian, I have to nitpick a bit, since there's an exception to every rule. It's true that most Africans are incapable of organized, disciplined warfare, but the Zulus were a definite exception. If the British had stayed out of the region, they likely would've consolidated much of Southern Africa, perhaps brokering a deal with the Voortrekkers. Ultimately, that would've been a better timeline, but the Cape of Good Hope is far too useful as a port for sailing ships, and thus too useful for a mercantile empire to pass up, and the rest, as they say, is history.
Another exception is the Maasai, the nomadic warriors of Africa.
There are degrees of competence at warfare; black pastoralists were much better warriors than black farmers, as pastoralists typically are. Even if the Zulu had a similar degree of capability to the Aztec empire, which seems a fair comparison given the level of development of the most civilized African kingdoms, the European was and is a level above that.
Indeed, those are fair points. While some Africans rise above the mean, we certainly don't see anything comparable to Prussia, for instance. My main intention was to elaborate and provide constructive criticism.
In conjunction with strength training and lots of hiking, which will boost your base metabolism, your diet should be high in animal fats and meat, you should attempt to eat as little polyunsaturated fat as possible, and when attempting to gain muscle, your caloric surplus over your base metabolism should be mostly protein. Some people like to stay away from carbs, but if your metabolism is healthy, carbs won’t pose too much of a problem. I know some very fit and active people who are carnivores, who have plenty of energy without eating carbs, and some very fit people who can suck down big bowls of pasta without blimping up. It is easy to overthink a diet- having a good metabolism is more important than a perfectly optimized diet. Cutting out foods and toxins that damage the metabolism (chiefly PUFA) goes hand in hand with an exercise regimen that improves the metabolism.
Fair enough. I asked the question because, if someone were to ask one of us what is the best diet in a vacuum, full raw carnivore would be the likely answer... But New Lacedaemonian army rations can't consist of prime beef steaks every day; you need to have carbs account for most of the calories simply for economic reasons.
Potatoes and rice are cheap and easy to digest. Modern gluten is terrible.
Eggs are the cheapest animal protein, with some of the best fat to boot.
Cheese is also a great source of protein and minerals, and is made to last.
Honey is nature's energy bar. Raw honey and raw cheese are excellent.
Vitamins could come from the occasional offal serving...
An army marches on its stomach, so these things have to be well though-out.
During the initial conquest, living off the land serves the dual purpose of keeping our forces fed and causing food insecurity in the native population that will encourage them to either leave of their own accord or starve. The historical "chevauchee" should be instructive here.
When we have a state of our own, MREs are terrible for you. When I go backpacking, salami and hard cheese pull a lot of weight. Grains are heavy compared to the nutrition they have in them. Honey is a more efficient way to concentrate sugar, and highland shortbread is extremely dense and filling. Offal jerky, cured meats like salami, hard cheeses, honey, and shortbread are probably the ideal rations for an army deep afield that does not have easy access to logistics.
Essentially. Men who are not immediately cut out for killing will be apprenticed. They will bear ammo, food, and equipment, and bear a lot of the work in encamping, entrenching, and other work that warriors historically did not often bother with, including procurement of supplies. If their master is KIA, they will be expected to pick up his rifle and fight in his place. But they will be there under real fire, though not sticking their heads out. Much more effective at toughening one up than bootcamp is to go out with the real soldiers and do most of the same stuff they do.
Apprentice soldiery will also be the method by which a class of non-founders (white immigrants who come to stay after the first conquest) will be able to earn their citizenship and the right to carry a rifle.
South Africa would be an ideal place to start if possible. Plenty of white Afrikaners who would help us, located at a strategic point for global trade networks, healthy climate. I suggest we name the country Draka after the S.M. Stirling novels
South Africa is a lot to chew for a thousand man army, and if we invaded directly, we might find ourselves opposed by the white security companies that protect the whites who keep the power on in SA. But our success may well trigger takeovers by white PMCs across Africa. The states they set up will probably be of a more liberal and humanitarian character, though still extremely racist by the West's standards. I personally like Madagascar as a target, but it is a quiet protectorate of the French, the Western nation least reliant on GAE military might.
I get the appeal and ecological reasoning for Africa but did you know that there is an island so remote people forget to put it on maps? Yet large enough to sustain tens of millions? With no resources so that you'll be left alone, but endowed with fertile land like no other? Conveniently, has a larger, more remote island to serve as an alpine base. Just saying.
Yes, but its also a pastoral, mountainous life for your first couple generations. Like its been for all conquering barbarians who ever came down on decadent cities.
Many cases of fine races degenerating due to ease of island life. The people who settled the pacific islands in 12,000 BC likely had the most advanced technics of any race of men at that period in history, and ended up producing one of the most primitive and shiftless peoples imaginable.
There's an optimal point between the extremes of a fully isolated and protected garden, and the middle of the jungle with lions all around.
What is being proposed above is to re-test a social system that is expected to multiply your warrior caste to to the point where expansion becomes feasible again.
But to get there you need a few generations, and a garden big enough to sustain your numbers and yet firce you into the pastoral lifestyle due to lack of alternative resources.
Boer Genocide was aided and abetted by the West, which would have gone as far as full invasion and total war to protect holy negroes from apartheid if the whites chose to fight back. With no west to back them up, once satellites, predator drones, carriers, and nuke subs no longer work due to declining competence, the native logistical capacity of the African is even worse than his tactical capability.
"this would result in a global media shitstorm about Nazis colonizing Afreaka followed shortly thereafter by literally every other nation on Earth declaring war on your warband, and shoving one another out of the way to be the first to drone strike you and post the footage on liveleak"
Yes, our conquest would immediately stir up hate from most of the world and we are not going to keep it secret. I will repeat my self clearly:
THIS WILL ONLY WORK AFTER WESTERN POWERS ARE TOO WEAK TO MILITARILY OPPOSE IT
One day, before too long, though it might even be thirty more years, the aircraft carriers will cease to float, the missiles will cease to fly, and the nukes will fail to detonate, if our nukes even work right now. If nothing changes, in 100 years, our great grandchildren will believe that airplanes were a myth invented by evil white devils (almost everyone will be a shade of brown) to scare people into compliance.
All this takes is the collapse of the GAE ability to project force, and then the king of Lacedaemonia will be able to call into a UN meeting, nude save for a leopard pelt, and call President Ocasio-Cortez of Favelamerica a tirade of slurs while laughing; and they will be able to do nothing about it but seethe. The GAE is blundering toward fighting a very stupid war that will likely end with most of its fleet on the bottom of the sea, but even as things are, the current war it is supplying has failed to get it to shape up its manufacturing abilities. It is simply not possible while Shaniqua is tech lead. Every shell and missile the Ukraine fires pushes the timeframe for our piracy forward.
Rhodesia, after being sanctioned up the ass, was almost completely economically self-sufficient. And we will be in a better position, because China, India, and the Arab world at the very least do not give a rat's ass about the wellbeing of blacks as long as the bauxite keeps flowing. Watch Empire of Dust. My historical and cultural intuition is that the Hanborg will be glad to have somebody effectively exploiting Afreaka's resources, because they cannot really do it themselves.
We are going to avoid the mistake of the Spanish by not impregnating the local women, and especially not marrying them or giving their spawn rights of inheritance. The beaches of the world are full of hot young white women. The black flags of our corsairs, out on wife-raids, will be a common sight in the future, and this will only increase the number of nubile young women vacationing there.
Vitriol aside, you raise some valid points, which deserve to be addressed in a full-length post, but I can now tell that you are not arguing in good faith if you strawman my positions like this:
"Why would a military tech obsessed sperg who is building NVGs using off the shelf parts and a 3D printer give you the time of day when you go out of your way not just to have nothing to offer him, but to explicitly state in your social media presence that you want to enslave him?"
The engineer is very far from being a natural slave, is an expression of a high form of humanity, and was necessary but not sufficient to the white man's global dominance. Here is what I actually said on the topic:
"English chads, wielding weapons invented and forged meticulously to spec by English autist blacksmiths and tinkers, conquered the world. And all this goes back hundreds of years, making sure that the autist smith, too busy with hammering tiny identically-sized metal rods into rings to bother socializing or chasing women, could get rich, have a loyal wife, and a big family. When we talk about trickle-down eugenics, about wanting higher elite fertility, you need the middle classes, engineers and scientists, high IQ and not a whole lot else, to be reproducing too... I have a great respect for engineers and scientists. But on the other hand... 'treat engineers with religious reverence' is equally dangerous and misguided. The “Chad” traits, the alpha male skills of establishing and enforcing male cooperation are infinitely more rare and valuable. Like I said, the smartest guy on a nuclear submarine is the nuclear technician, but he belongs running the reactor and not holding the red button."
That is quoted directly from my old blog, and what the new state has to offer engineers should be eminently obvious from my quoted words. An engineer who settles in Lacedaemonia will be far wealthier and more respected then he is in the West today, where he is beaten down by HR catlady in a feminine society. Engineers need status to get things done. America could not put a rocket on the moon until Von Braun was *in charge* of the project and answered to nobody. We will have a massive advantage in engineering because our engineers will not answer to catladies, not answer to Shaniqua. Religious respect for the private property of freemen and the freehold means that every engineer owns his own project.
"Alphas have no reason to defect on the regime so long as hookup pussy remain on tap."
Not everyone is a slave to pussy. Running through thots and dropping out of the game are reactions to the same problem, the problem of not being to own a woman and have assured paternity. Running through thots is stressful and depressing, as being celibate is stressful and depressing. Both are reactions to the spiritually disgusting tragedy of not being able to keep a woman. And I am not saying you don't have it worse; thots are still preferable to celibacy.
"I disagree with you because most alphas are happy to defect on nerds like me,"
We live in an environment of universal defection, especially in the corporate world, because it is a feminized environment with HR at the top. There are as many consequences for feminine defection as there are at the popular girls' table in the middle school cafeteria; that is to say none. This environment is GHEY! You propose to rise to the top through it, conquer it. I say escape it when it is too weak to chase and attack it from outside when it is even weaker.
FFT is one of my favorite videogames as well, btw- and we need men like you. You call yourself a sperg; who better to calibrate and coordinate an artillery barrage, aim a field mortar or pilot a drone?
The female resources of Africa? I'm sure there are some desirable specimens but from what I've seen I'd pass on 95% of them...100% if I couldn't be sure they were clean.
Clear vision - as always from you
"The beaches of the world are full of hot young white women. The black flags of our corsairs, out on wife-raids, will be a common sight in the future, and this will only increase the number of nubile young women vacationing there."
This is the most ridiculous part of your larp
Very solid advice here. However, being an armchair historian, I have to nitpick a bit, since there's an exception to every rule. It's true that most Africans are incapable of organized, disciplined warfare, but the Zulus were a definite exception. If the British had stayed out of the region, they likely would've consolidated much of Southern Africa, perhaps brokering a deal with the Voortrekkers. Ultimately, that would've been a better timeline, but the Cape of Good Hope is far too useful as a port for sailing ships, and thus too useful for a mercantile empire to pass up, and the rest, as they say, is history.
Another exception is the Maasai, the nomadic warriors of Africa.
There are degrees of competence at warfare; black pastoralists were much better warriors than black farmers, as pastoralists typically are. Even if the Zulu had a similar degree of capability to the Aztec empire, which seems a fair comparison given the level of development of the most civilized African kingdoms, the European was and is a level above that.
Indeed, those are fair points. While some Africans rise above the mean, we certainly don't see anything comparable to Prussia, for instance. My main intention was to elaborate and provide constructive criticism.
What diet would you recommend in order to get a soldier's physique? (muscular yet lean and energy-efficient)
In conjunction with strength training and lots of hiking, which will boost your base metabolism, your diet should be high in animal fats and meat, you should attempt to eat as little polyunsaturated fat as possible, and when attempting to gain muscle, your caloric surplus over your base metabolism should be mostly protein. Some people like to stay away from carbs, but if your metabolism is healthy, carbs won’t pose too much of a problem. I know some very fit and active people who are carnivores, who have plenty of energy without eating carbs, and some very fit people who can suck down big bowls of pasta without blimping up. It is easy to overthink a diet- having a good metabolism is more important than a perfectly optimized diet. Cutting out foods and toxins that damage the metabolism (chiefly PUFA) goes hand in hand with an exercise regimen that improves the metabolism.
Fair enough. I asked the question because, if someone were to ask one of us what is the best diet in a vacuum, full raw carnivore would be the likely answer... But New Lacedaemonian army rations can't consist of prime beef steaks every day; you need to have carbs account for most of the calories simply for economic reasons.
Potatoes and rice are cheap and easy to digest. Modern gluten is terrible.
Eggs are the cheapest animal protein, with some of the best fat to boot.
Cheese is also a great source of protein and minerals, and is made to last.
Honey is nature's energy bar. Raw honey and raw cheese are excellent.
Vitamins could come from the occasional offal serving...
An army marches on its stomach, so these things have to be well though-out.
During the initial conquest, living off the land serves the dual purpose of keeping our forces fed and causing food insecurity in the native population that will encourage them to either leave of their own accord or starve. The historical "chevauchee" should be instructive here.
When we have a state of our own, MREs are terrible for you. When I go backpacking, salami and hard cheese pull a lot of weight. Grains are heavy compared to the nutrition they have in them. Honey is a more efficient way to concentrate sugar, and highland shortbread is extremely dense and filling. Offal jerky, cured meats like salami, hard cheeses, honey, and shortbread are probably the ideal rations for an army deep afield that does not have easy access to logistics.
Great article. Where can I find the previous writings you mentioned?
I'd be interested in hearing more about your "apprentice soldiers" concept. Are you essentially talking about modern day pages and squires?
Essentially. Men who are not immediately cut out for killing will be apprenticed. They will bear ammo, food, and equipment, and bear a lot of the work in encamping, entrenching, and other work that warriors historically did not often bother with, including procurement of supplies. If their master is KIA, they will be expected to pick up his rifle and fight in his place. But they will be there under real fire, though not sticking their heads out. Much more effective at toughening one up than bootcamp is to go out with the real soldiers and do most of the same stuff they do.
Apprentice soldiery will also be the method by which a class of non-founders (white immigrants who come to stay after the first conquest) will be able to earn their citizenship and the right to carry a rifle.
A very interesting concept for a modern day warrior aristocracy. Perhaps there is a chance, however small, that we see it realized.
South Africa would be an ideal place to start if possible. Plenty of white Afrikaners who would help us, located at a strategic point for global trade networks, healthy climate. I suggest we name the country Draka after the S.M. Stirling novels
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Domination
South Africa is a lot to chew for a thousand man army, and if we invaded directly, we might find ourselves opposed by the white security companies that protect the whites who keep the power on in SA. But our success may well trigger takeovers by white PMCs across Africa. The states they set up will probably be of a more liberal and humanitarian character, though still extremely racist by the West's standards. I personally like Madagascar as a target, but it is a quiet protectorate of the French, the Western nation least reliant on GAE military might.
I get the appeal and ecological reasoning for Africa but did you know that there is an island so remote people forget to put it on maps? Yet large enough to sustain tens of millions? With no resources so that you'll be left alone, but endowed with fertile land like no other? Conveniently, has a larger, more remote island to serve as an alpine base. Just saying.
That sounds nice if you want to be a farmer and live unbothered by history.
Yes, but its also a pastoral, mountainous life for your first couple generations. Like its been for all conquering barbarians who ever came down on decadent cities.
Many cases of fine races degenerating due to ease of island life. The people who settled the pacific islands in 12,000 BC likely had the most advanced technics of any race of men at that period in history, and ended up producing one of the most primitive and shiftless peoples imaginable.
I endorse not having to fight before one is ready. Avoiding the Dutch Disease also helps.
The island shall remain nameless but its out there.
There's an optimal point between the extremes of a fully isolated and protected garden, and the middle of the jungle with lions all around.
What is being proposed above is to re-test a social system that is expected to multiply your warrior caste to to the point where expansion becomes feasible again.
But to get there you need a few generations, and a garden big enough to sustain your numbers and yet firce you into the pastoral lifestyle due to lack of alternative resources.
Boer Genocide was aided and abetted by the West, which would have gone as far as full invasion and total war to protect holy negroes from apartheid if the whites chose to fight back. With no west to back them up, once satellites, predator drones, carriers, and nuke subs no longer work due to declining competence, the native logistical capacity of the African is even worse than his tactical capability.
"this would result in a global media shitstorm about Nazis colonizing Afreaka followed shortly thereafter by literally every other nation on Earth declaring war on your warband, and shoving one another out of the way to be the first to drone strike you and post the footage on liveleak"
Yes, our conquest would immediately stir up hate from most of the world and we are not going to keep it secret. I will repeat my self clearly:
THIS WILL ONLY WORK AFTER WESTERN POWERS ARE TOO WEAK TO MILITARILY OPPOSE IT
One day, before too long, though it might even be thirty more years, the aircraft carriers will cease to float, the missiles will cease to fly, and the nukes will fail to detonate, if our nukes even work right now. If nothing changes, in 100 years, our great grandchildren will believe that airplanes were a myth invented by evil white devils (almost everyone will be a shade of brown) to scare people into compliance.
All this takes is the collapse of the GAE ability to project force, and then the king of Lacedaemonia will be able to call into a UN meeting, nude save for a leopard pelt, and call President Ocasio-Cortez of Favelamerica a tirade of slurs while laughing; and they will be able to do nothing about it but seethe. The GAE is blundering toward fighting a very stupid war that will likely end with most of its fleet on the bottom of the sea, but even as things are, the current war it is supplying has failed to get it to shape up its manufacturing abilities. It is simply not possible while Shaniqua is tech lead. Every shell and missile the Ukraine fires pushes the timeframe for our piracy forward.
Rhodesia, after being sanctioned up the ass, was almost completely economically self-sufficient. And we will be in a better position, because China, India, and the Arab world at the very least do not give a rat's ass about the wellbeing of blacks as long as the bauxite keeps flowing. Watch Empire of Dust. My historical and cultural intuition is that the Hanborg will be glad to have somebody effectively exploiting Afreaka's resources, because they cannot really do it themselves.
We are going to avoid the mistake of the Spanish by not impregnating the local women, and especially not marrying them or giving their spawn rights of inheritance. The beaches of the world are full of hot young white women. The black flags of our corsairs, out on wife-raids, will be a common sight in the future, and this will only increase the number of nubile young women vacationing there.
Vitriol aside, you raise some valid points, which deserve to be addressed in a full-length post, but I can now tell that you are not arguing in good faith if you strawman my positions like this:
"Why would a military tech obsessed sperg who is building NVGs using off the shelf parts and a 3D printer give you the time of day when you go out of your way not just to have nothing to offer him, but to explicitly state in your social media presence that you want to enslave him?"
The engineer is very far from being a natural slave, is an expression of a high form of humanity, and was necessary but not sufficient to the white man's global dominance. Here is what I actually said on the topic:
"English chads, wielding weapons invented and forged meticulously to spec by English autist blacksmiths and tinkers, conquered the world. And all this goes back hundreds of years, making sure that the autist smith, too busy with hammering tiny identically-sized metal rods into rings to bother socializing or chasing women, could get rich, have a loyal wife, and a big family. When we talk about trickle-down eugenics, about wanting higher elite fertility, you need the middle classes, engineers and scientists, high IQ and not a whole lot else, to be reproducing too... I have a great respect for engineers and scientists. But on the other hand... 'treat engineers with religious reverence' is equally dangerous and misguided. The “Chad” traits, the alpha male skills of establishing and enforcing male cooperation are infinitely more rare and valuable. Like I said, the smartest guy on a nuclear submarine is the nuclear technician, but he belongs running the reactor and not holding the red button."
That is quoted directly from my old blog, and what the new state has to offer engineers should be eminently obvious from my quoted words. An engineer who settles in Lacedaemonia will be far wealthier and more respected then he is in the West today, where he is beaten down by HR catlady in a feminine society. Engineers need status to get things done. America could not put a rocket on the moon until Von Braun was *in charge* of the project and answered to nobody. We will have a massive advantage in engineering because our engineers will not answer to catladies, not answer to Shaniqua. Religious respect for the private property of freemen and the freehold means that every engineer owns his own project.
"Alphas have no reason to defect on the regime so long as hookup pussy remain on tap."
Not everyone is a slave to pussy. Running through thots and dropping out of the game are reactions to the same problem, the problem of not being to own a woman and have assured paternity. Running through thots is stressful and depressing, as being celibate is stressful and depressing. Both are reactions to the spiritually disgusting tragedy of not being able to keep a woman. And I am not saying you don't have it worse; thots are still preferable to celibacy.
"I disagree with you because most alphas are happy to defect on nerds like me,"
We live in an environment of universal defection, especially in the corporate world, because it is a feminized environment with HR at the top. There are as many consequences for feminine defection as there are at the popular girls' table in the middle school cafeteria; that is to say none. This environment is GHEY! You propose to rise to the top through it, conquer it. I say escape it when it is too weak to chase and attack it from outside when it is even weaker.
FFT is one of my favorite videogames as well, btw- and we need men like you. You call yourself a sperg; who better to calibrate and coordinate an artillery barrage, aim a field mortar or pilot a drone?
The female resources of Africa? I'm sure there are some desirable specimens but from what I've seen I'd pass on 95% of them...100% if I couldn't be sure they were clean.
Also, the idea of NGO sponsored buckbreaking is fucking hilarious.