Objections to the Chevauchee

And their responses

I’ve heard several objections to my project over the course of pushing it, some here and some elsewhere. Some are quite substantial, and need to be responded to with debate. Others are mere misconceptions, and need to be clarified.

Absent an implausible media blackout in this the smartphone age or a plausible explanation for why several thousand White men are running around limiting scholars, this would result in a global media shitstorm about Nazis colonizing Afreaka followed shortly thereafter by literally every other nation on Earth declaring war on your warband, and shoving one another out of the way to be the first to drone strike you and post the footage on liveleak.

The idea, of course, and I need to restate this, is to wait until such a response is no longer possible. One day, before too long, though it might even be thirty more years, the aircraft carriers will cease to float, the missiles will cease to fly, and the nukes will fail to detonate, if our nukes even work right now. On our current course, in 100 years, our great grandchildren will believe that airplanes were a myth invented by evil white devils (almost everyone will be a shade of brown) to scare people into compliance.

Why wait until our hostile regime falls when you can get started now?

We could start a PMC now, and amass some wealth, but we would be fighting for the GAE. It is very likely that we should start a PMC or security company soon to gain some experience and more importantly amass equipment, but the problem of my pointing men towards an operation that must publicly remain in Big Gay's good graces is hard to solve. Right now, the PMCs in SA are effectively propping up the anti-white Bantu state. It does not fix anything until the GAE crumbles.

How exactly you plan to transport donated European eggs for your warriors to make their new nation using your kweenz as surrogates.

We are not going to impregnate the local women, avoiding the problem that the Conquistadors had. I think the crowd attracted to this is sufficiently racist to avoid racemixing at scale, but we must outlaw interracial marriages and ensure that any bastards which occur do not have rights. Wives will be provided to the first generation via piratical raids on beaches across the world, which have no shortage of hot white women, and indeed they will frequent these locations even more often once the possibility of the black flag appearing on the horizon exists. It may be wise to make an exception for first generation conquerers, and let them have as many wives as they can. 1000 men with ten wives each, and ten kids per wife, is 100,000 in the second generation. Even if half that, it is a thing to be reckoned with. If we then restore monogamy for the sake of social order, the third generation could number 1,000,000, and the fourth 10,000,000. This opens up very many possibilites.

The military is first a machine for processing vast amounts of raw data into useful info. Second a machine for moving men, machines, and supplies. Third a machine for maintaining those machines. Fourth a machine for ensuring continuity of knowledge, especially what can't be recorded in a manual or requires talent. Fighting and winning wars is a distant fifth.

That is the modern socialist military. The private sector is far more efficient and skilled at logistics than any command system. If you read Xenophon’s March Upcountry, you will find that the army is chiefly supplied by a vast array of private interests that soldiers buy things from. This was still the case in the 1700s AD; putting camp followers in uniform simply steals valor from the soldiers, and militaries have lost their prestige and influence as they have been socialized. This is not a problem during the initial conquest; an army numbering in the thousands can simply live off the land. When the conqest is complete, and wars against other states are engaged in, having a soldier-aristocracy means that ranking officers will own the corporations providing logistics. Men who own farms will sell the food they grow to a distribution company, which trucks the food to the front, where soldiers buy it. Likewise with ammo. It will be almost certain that high ranking officers are going to personally own the heavy equipment their divisions are responsible for. It may of course be easier to organize the military as a “sovereign corporation” to begin with, which owns as a corporate body the necessary equipment to wage war.

The question then is how to accomplish those tasks and link them all together without rousing the beast. There is no answer for that except to coldly and calmly go forth to build. Being a legitimate tax paying entity is one option, as is disguising your work as charity in support of homosexuality in Botswana. You could develop parallel machine tooling systems that just happen to implement US military standards for totally unrelated tasks. Your goal should be less to become a pirate king and more to found a Great House, like House Atreides in the original Dune books. Thus your personal mission is one of of finding personnel and using them to exploit specific niches so both you and them can make money and enjoy other perks. And over time stitch these disparate pieces into a coherent whole, and raise your sons to expand into various niches, and your daughters to be head hunters for talent. Eventually one of your grandkids will be in a position to sync up the machine and turn all its parts towards a single goal.

I must warn you that the (big, hooked) nose of the Left is very good at sniffing out heresy. If you are devoted to holy causes, they might look the other way on hiring competent white men instead of Shaniqua, as they made a principled exception for Musk. But if you are not hiring Shaniqua in positions of power and status, it is very likely that your operation will be destroyed by lawfare. Trying to build power and influence within the system secretly is commendable enough, but just keep in mind that it can be taken away with the stroke of a pen. That path is not for me.

[Tech collapse won’t happen if the regime imports] workers from China to staff the factories and replace the wypipo they hate.

How are the new semiconductor factories in the US coming along? Either the Chinese in America will still answer to Shaniqua, or they will remove Shaniqua. If they can oust Shaniqua, that is ousting the white and jewish progressive elite, and we would be able to say that America is ruled by a Sinicized regime. In which case they will be uninterested in what we do in the tropics. If they conquer Shaniqua here, won’t care if we conquer Shaniqua there. And it is likely that such a Sinicized regime will focus on manufacturing plastic lawn chairs for its brown underclass rather than cluster munitions for foreign wars.

Chinese neutrality, which given their valid fear of White men stealing their women and their supplying of Mexican cartels with precursors for meth and fentanyl (and who knows what else) can not and should not be assumed.

China is a nation of shopkeepers. They can profit off of fent and weaken a geopolitical rival, they’re going to do it. That’s easy. Sailing a navy constructed entirely for defense of the South China Sea halfway around the world and engaging in hot war to protect the rights of people they consider inhuman? Nah. When we go in, we send a message assuring China that their citizens and property interests will be protected, and that they will do better under our rule. And we make sure that they get preferential trade agreements with everything they were extracting before, plus new stuff.

[Against] Chinese incompetence. We know that suppressing revolts is what they do best.

Suppressing revolts is easy. Especially against people like Tibetans and Yoghurts. Easy to destroy internal dissent with a police state. Hard to destroy a hostile foreign nation. This is also a hint as to why I want to go to Africa and not start a peasant rebellion in Appalachia.

The White minorities who have favored positions in places other than South Africa and Zimbabwe will just let you steal their mines, factories, and farms?

They’re free to join us or leave. (“I own this land now, keep your factory and I get a cut, or go home and I take it”) But they are protected right now by whatever strongman is currently in charge, and won’t put up much fuss when another strongman takes over.

The Hindu merchant minorities will just hand over their estates to you.

Who will defend them? India’s formidable blue water navy? Lol.

Someone like me won't enact my plan and steal Africa before you, while you impotently wait around for Easy Mode conquest like a scrub.

It’s a big place. Plenty of room for competing colonies. I expect the Arab world to get on with its historically normal exploitation of Sub-Saharan Africa for gold and slaves after white powers cannot protect it. That would be a hell of a war, fighting the Arabs for control of Africa a few generations down the line.

China doesn't outright colonize Africa right now because they fear an Afghanistan or Vietnam situation, and because they need access to markets to keep their workers at max employment. If they lose access to markets in the USA, the Anglosphere, and Europe, then their workers walk out of the factories and hang every party member from the nearest lamppost.

However if the USA loses the ability to project force overseas, China will enact your plan before you do, and with a vastly superior logistics chain and local co-ethnics to boot. They won't have to fear the USA using insurgents to fight them then because they can just genocide whatever population is hiding the insurgents.

China has never once in three thousand years founded an overseas colony in the Western style. It does not want to, does not even consider the possibility. It wants to be the middle kingdom around which the barbarians orbit. It discovered Africa five hundred years ago and said “meh”. They get richer when we rule, they’ll be happy to support our rule. China is likely to install some puppet states in Africa when the US leaves. Naturally, we will not tread on them, but China has for the last fifteen hundred years been constantly on the defensive, conquered over and over again by vastly outnumbered barbarians. It is stagnant and uncreative, not wise and cunning.

If you waltz in and try to steal a Chinese factory, they'll just bomb you. If you actually succeed in setting up a microstate and squatting over a gold mine, they'll just gas you.

You waltz in and tell them that you own the land, and they can continue operations as long as they pay a 5% tax to the new sovereign. “Just bomb them” and “just gas them” are not effective military strategy.

1. Befriend lots of nerdy beta male engineers (ugh, just ugh) you love to lord it over and have them develop your own "mine to finished product" supply chains for STS missiles and WMDs.

Yes, that is the plan. Many of my friends already fall into this camp. Real engineering and real science will be possible. An engineer who settles in Lacedaemonia will be far wealthier and more respected then he is in the West today, where he is beaten down by HR catlady in a feminine society. Engineers need status to get things done. America could not put a rocket on the moon until Von Braun was *in charge* of the project and answered to nobody. We will have a massive advantage in engineering because our engineers will not answer to catladies, not answer to Shaniqua. Religious respect for the private property of freemen and the freehold means that every engineer owns his own project. We will be able to actually advance the art and science of war.

I do not intend that we be lords over mud farms and mines. I intend to eventually build a technologically advanced civilization, and by that, I mean to attract the men who will build an advanced civilization.

Speaking of number 1, why would any nerd work for you?

Money, status, actual ownership of his property, the freedom to work on what he wants, virgin wives with lots of descendants. Status as a peer will rely on membership of the army, but who better than a nerd to pilot a drone, aim a field mortar, or calibrate and coordinate an artillery barrage? Otherwise you’re a perfectly respectable freeholder with more rights and freedoms than an American citizen has today.

Everything you've said, both here, on your old blog, and on social media, is like a schoolboy's daydream.

Schoolboys remember the ancient glories in their blood. “Everything you thought was cool when you were twelve is what is actually cool…”

Successful, purely military conquest as you speak of it requires two things:

1. Selfless, egoless cooperation.

The Saxon conquests of England, the Norse conquests, the Norman conquests, the Aryan invasions of everywhere, the pirates who founded Rome, were all motivated by profit and glory. Selfless cooperation is an element of social order that comes later, that we will certainly work on.

2. Carefully planned and executed manufacturing at scale, from resource extraction to shipping finished goods.

Against large states, yes. And because we will practise capitalism in its original form, we will be far more successful at this once established than any other state.

You are clearly not capable of either. You believe that logistics will just happen without anyone planning them in advance.

Obviously, it will take a good deal of logistics to acquire ships and outfit our men before we go. That will be difficult, and it will rely on the human and monetary capital we are able to attract ahead of time

As it stands your advice has no basis in reality, and without someone to pull your head out of the clouds you are basically a lolcow.

So was Cortes, and Pizarro… until they did it.

You want to be Cortés. You’ll be asking men to stick with you for the rest of their lives in some god forsaken land among a bunch of savages who want to fucking kill all of you. That’s a tall ask. You better at least have sheer force of will. A mystic. A cult of personality. Effectively a faith to pull this off. This takes you right back to my point. You need to create a warrior priesthood first, and as the leader of any aspiring war band, you’re the first priest.

I am pretty good at inspiring people, but I do not consider myself a great leader. Should one arise, I’d be happy to hand over the reigns to him. But again, I want young men with no real future in the West. Such men are forces that have toppled great empires. I think the promise of profit and glory are enough, at first. But it will indeed take great faith to stick it out once we get there.

While China and Russia don’t seem to be proponents of unified global government, they are still interested in government. They are talking about defending a multi-polar world order and produce real and viable international law, and they are indeed taking actionable steps in the physical world for this, it’s not just talk. What country in Africa are you going to colonize that will not bring this into the multi-polar international law council and complain? And why would Russia or China or the Arab League randomly let you take land like this?

The “multipolar world order” is a shibboleth that identifies resistance to the GAE and the petrodollar while couched in a soothing liberal frame. It has no ideological content. When the GAE falls, there will be a huge amount of war between nations. The analogy is the collapse of the Bronze Age. China does not give a fuck about the well-being of blacks. They will be happy to trade with us. The collapse of GAE power and the cessation of food aid will cause such an orgy of civil war, starvation, and brutality in Africa that our state would be a near-singular source of material. China was not backing the Taliban, but when the Taliban won, China sat down at the table and signed deals with them to keep the roads open regardless of the Talibans “civil rights” record. The deal comes after the conquest. But of course we’d be amenable to signing on with them to protect some asset in Africa, and then “hey well you asked us to provide security, one thing led to another, now we control the country and half of the neighboring one. By the way I own this mine now but we’re willing to offer you a sweet deal on the metal…”

[Why not just take over the US?] The regime will have no ability to enforce anything beyond the DC/NYC city limits after the carriers are gone. The FBI is just a dinky little militia. A county in the middle of Appalachia can easily destroy the FBI, when there’s no magical F-35 to provide the FBI with air support.

The USG will be able to maintain an internal sovereignty on violence long after technological decline destroys its ability to project power on the world stage. Brazil has no overseas power, but it has enough police power to impose GNC on its productive white and white-ish populace. What do you think would happen to Brazil without GAE hegemony supporting its state? That is what will happen to the US when GAE imperial power fails. I don’t think anything based would come out of Brazil in the absence of US power. At best a lukewarm brown military caudilloism that causes Brezhnevian stagnation.

Or we could destroy savage nations, conquer land, tame a wild continent and have the power and freedom of ancient warlords.